Minnesota Divorce Attorney Firm Overview Attorney Profiles Client Testimonials Counties Severed Contact Us
Client Testimonials Why Choose us? Watch our Videos.
Divorce
Contested Divorce
Uncontested Divorce
Child Custody
Child Support
Alimony
Annulment
Child Protective Services
Cohabitation Agreement
Collaborative Divorce
Complex Divorces & Property Division
Contempt Process
Custody Evaluation
Default Divorce
Divorce Appeals
Divorce Decree
Divorce Mediation
Divorce Proceedings
Domestic Abuse
Early Neutral Evaluation
Enforcement of Court Orders
Enforcement of Settlement Agreements
Ex Parte Orders
Family Wizard
Family Law Acronyms
FAQ
Fathers' Rights
Flexible Rates for Simple Dissolution
Grandparents' Rights
Guardians Ad Litem
High Net Worth Divorce
Initial Case Management
IV-D System
Legal Guardianship
Legal Separation
Military Divorce
Mother's Rights
Orders of Protection
Orders of Protection vs. Harassment Restraining
Parenting Time & Visitation Rights
Paternity
Prenuptial Agreement
Probate
Property Division: Who Gets What?
Same Sex Marriages
Stipulations in Divorce
Temporary Relief
Instantly connect to our office.

Stock Options and Divorce

Today, stock options can be significant assets in a marital estate that need to be divided during a divorce. Many employees from mid-level to executive participate in corporate stock option plans. A stock option allows the holder of the option to purchase a predetermined number of shares, prior to a specified expiration date, at a set price (called the Strike Price). Stock options are granted to an employee to induce that person to join or stay with a company or as compensation. The right to purchase the stock is usually for a set period of time and the options vest over time. The options are usually unvested when received. Deciding to purchase the stock is called exercising the option. A stock option is treated as marital property even though it may not be vested. The most instructive case in Minnesota with respect to dealing with stock options in divorce is Salstrom v. Salstrom, 404 N.W.2d 848 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). If the option has not yet vested at the time of the divorce, there will be both a marital and a nonmarital component to the option. Id. The basic rule that came out of Salstrom with respect to unvested stock options is that the marital interest in each payment will be a fraction of that payment, the numerator of the fraction being the number of years (or months) of marriage during which benefits were being accumulated, the denominator being the total number of years (or months) during which benefits were accumulated prior to being paid. Salstrom at 851. For example, if the husband was awarded 500 stock options on January 1, 2005 and they do not vest until January 1, 2010 but the parties divorce on January 1, 2009, the stock options are 80% marital property and 20% nonmarital property. There are various tax consequences when applying the Salstrom formula and exercising certain kinds of stock options and it is best to consult a tax professional and an attorney when dealing with stock options and divorce.

Follow us on Facebook
Minnesota Family Law Attorney | Contact Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy

Attorney Web DesignThe information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.