Archive for the ‘Alimony’ Category

Determining a spousal maintenance award in Minnesota Divorce

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Spousal maintenance, formerly known as “alimony”, is not as common as is often believed.  The typical spousal maintenance case involves a long-term marriage where one spouse did not work outside of the home, but rather stayed home and cared for the children or the household.  They either have no higher education or it is outdated, causing the need to obtain more schooling to be able to work in the field.

 Spousal maintenance can either be permanent or temporary in nature.  There is nothing in the statutes to favor temporary spousal maintenance over a permanent award. 

 The court looks at multiple factors to determine if spousal maintenance is appropriate, but the biggest factors to consider are the need of the spouse requesting maintenance, the ability of the other spouse to pay, and the standard of living established during the marriage. 

 Therea re tax implications for characterizing a settlement as a maintenance payment rather than a property settlement.  If the divorcing parties have enough assets to arrange for a property settlement to support the receiving spouse, it may be the better option.  However, there are benefits to each option and they should be weighed in discussions with your Minnesota divorce attorney.

What Happens When My Spouse Doesn't Want a Divorce in Minnesota and I Do?

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

When one party wants to get divorced, there is no way to stop the process from happening.  The party choosing to begin the divorce process (the “Petitioner”) starts by having two documents personally handed to the other party (the “Respondent”): the Summons and the Petition.  The Petition sets out the basic facts of the marriage and the parties.  The Summons has restraining provisions in it, meaning things have to stay basically the same through the divorce process, and gives a 30-day time limit to respond to the paperwork.

If the Respondent misses the 30-day time limit to answer, the Petitioner is able to go back to the court, stating that the Respondent is in “default” and have the divorce processed anyway.  You may or may not have to make a court appearance, based on your specific circumstances.  Not all issues are always able to be resolved with a default, however.  if you have property out of state, or children out of state, you should consult with an attorney.  But the bottom line is not both parties need to participate in the process in order for the court to grant a divorce.

If you have been served with divorce papers, even if you do not want a divorce, it is in your best interest to respond within the 30-day time frame.  If you miss the deadline and the court enters the divorce without you having a say, it is very difficult to reopen the case later on.  If you have questions about what your rights are in the divorce process, contact a family law attorney today.  At Germscheid, Heimerl & Lammers, we offer free initial consultations.  Call us today to discuss your case.

ICMCs and the Early Neutral Evaluation Process

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

In Hennepin County and Ramsey County, the family courts have adjusted to make the process more amicable for cases.  Instead of filing a case and having nothing happen for some time, the courts have been automatically setting an initial hearing roughly 3-4 weeks after the time when the case was filed.  This hearing, called the Initial Case Management Conference or ICMC for short, allows the parties to meet the judicial officer in charge of their case.  It also gives the court the opportunity to assess the issues early on and determine what the best way to handle the case would be.

The ICMC is usually a very informal hearing.  Often at ICMCs, the court will order the parties to attend a mediation or early neutral evaluation.  This gives the parties the opportunity to work together to try to work out their problems before going further in the court process and becoming more divided.  Without using any alternative to court, the parties often become more hostile and set in their ways, and settlement becomes more and more difficult.  The courts do not really want to decide such personal issues for people, and the result is often easier for everyone to follow if the parties come to an agreement on any issues without a judge’s help.

Of course, not all cases are suited for resolving through mediation or early neutral evaluation.  For example, when domestic violence is an issue, it may be necessary to have the court’s involvement throughout the process.  ICMCs allow the court to discover that early on and possibly move up any trial dates so that parties can move on with their lives.

More and more counties are recognizing the benefits of earlier involvement in family law cases.  Early neutral evaluation is being integrated into many court systems across the state, and the results have been successful.

Preserving Your Rights When Your Ex Files For Bankruptcy

Monday, September 21st, 2009

In the current economy, many people have been faced with the reality of bankruptcy.  Often, people spent more than they had and are left holding the bill.  The bankruptcy process exists to give individuals a fresh start, but what happens when your ex has an ongoing obligation to you?

The bankruptcy court recognizes that some people might try to get rid of their obligations to former spouses, either in the form of spousal maintenance or child support, by filing for bankruptcy.  The support owed may have accrued so that there are significant arrears, or the ex may feel that they would rather the future obligation disappear.  The court does not allow this to happen.

Any obligation stemming from a “domestic support obligation”, including child support and alimony or spousal maintenance, is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.  Moreover, while all other debts of a person who files for bankruptcy are put on hold during the proceedings, a support obligation is not.  That means that you will still continue to get your monthly payments even as your ex goes through the entire bankruptcy process.

It is easy to understand the court’s basis for this special treatment.  Often, the last place a person wants to spend their money is giving it to their ex.  This is true for child support as well, since the obligor has to send a portion of their paycheck each month to the custodial parent.  If the bankruptcy court did not allow special treatment for domestic support obligations, then there would be a large increase in filings for this very reason.

If your ex is threatening bankruptcy, or is in the process and has stopped paying you your support, then you have the right to bring him or her back to court to enforce your support order.  It is always beneficial to speak with an attorney about your rights and see what steps you should take to protect yourself.

Welcome To Our Blog

Sunday, August 9th, 2009

This is our first post – we will begin posting soon. Please check back.



- Our Minnesota Divorce Lawyer & Attorney represent clients throughout Minneapolis and Twin Cities including St Paul, West St Paul, South St Paul, Mendota Heights, Mendota, Richfield, Edina, Bloomington, Inver Grove Heights, Woodbury, Oakdale, Lake Elmo, Maplewood, Vandais Heights, Mahtomedi, Cottage Grove, Columbia Heights, New Brighton, Arden Hills, Shoreview, North Oaks, White Bear Lake, St Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Crystal, Bloomington, Burnsville, Apple Valley, Savage, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka, New Hope, New Brighton, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Plymouth, Chanhassen and throughout the entire State of Minnesota.