Archive for the ‘Child Support’ Category

The Rights of Unmarried Fathers in Minnesota Family Court

Monday, October 12th, 2009

What are an unmarried Father’s Rights?

 If a man and a woman are unmarried at the time of a child’s birth, the mother has sole legal and physical custody until the Court issues an Order stating otherwise.  An unmarried father has to establish himself as the legal father of a child before he has any rights to ask for parenting time.  Even if the parties are exercising parenting time and getting along, it is always best for the father to get his rights established through the Court system.  Without a Court Order granting the father parenting time, the custodial parent (presumed to be the mother in these cases) could abruptly stop parenting time or not allow the father to see the child.  In most cases, this is not in the child’s best interest, but she has the legal right to stop visitation unless paternity has been established.

 

How can an unmarried father establish paternity?

 Paternity can be established in one of two ways:

  1.  By both parents signing a Recognition of Parentage (ROP). The ROP must be filed, and accepted by, the Minnesota Department of Health, Office of the State Registrar. An ROP does not automatically give the father the right to see the child. An ROP gives the father the right to go to court to ask for custody or parenting time.  This is a “starting point” for a father to ask for legal rights. 
  2. By court order in a Paternity Action (Paternity Order). You may be granted some custodial or parenting time rights in the paternity action.

 

Parenting Time and Child Support

 Even if an unmarried father is paying child support, he does not necessarily have legal rights to have parenting time with the child.  Additionally, a father should not be told that he cannot see his child until he is current on his child support obligation.  There are two different kinds of child support processes in Minnesota: one that uses a Magistrate and one that happens in District Court in front of a Judge. 

 An open child support case in front of a child support Magistrate is not the appropriate place to discuss parenting time or visitation.  A child support Magistrate cannot hear issues on parenting time or visitation.  The only time a child support Magistrate can decide an issue with parenting time and custody at a child support hearing is when the child support hearing is part of a hearing to establish paternity.  Then the child support magistrate can issue an order about those issues the mother and father agree on, like custody, parenting time, or the name of the child.

 However, if the motion or action is brought in District Court, the Judge has the power to hear all of the issues, including child support and visitation. 

   

Can an unmarried father get 50/50 or joint physical custody?

 The court looks at many different things the first time it decides custody. But the decision depends on the facts of each specific case. It is difficult to change a judge’s decision about custody after the decision has been made.

 The court looks at the following 13 “best interest” factors to decide what is in the best interests of the child. This is for the very first time the court decides custody. These factors are:

  1. What each parent wants for custody;
  2. What the child wants. This only counts if the child is old enough. Generally a child must be at least 10 years old before a court will ask about what they want. But the court will look at each child’s situation and decide if the child is old enough or able to say what they want.
  3. Who is the child’s primary caretaker;
  4. The closeness of the relationship between each parent and the child;
  5. The situation and relationship between the child and parents, siblings and other people who may play a big part in the child’s life (like grandparents or parent’s new partner);
  6. The child’s adjustment to home, school and community;
  7. The amount of time the child has lived in a stable and good environment and the need to maintain what the child is used to;
  8. The permanence of the proposed custodial home. For example, does the mother or father have a new boy or girl friend? If they live together, how long has it been? Is it likely to last?
  9. The mental and physical health of everyone involved;
  10. The ability and willingness of the parties to give the child love, affection and guidance and to keep educating and raising the child in his/her culture or religion;
  11. The child’s cultural background;
  12. If there is, or has been, domestic abuse by one parent against the other. How has that affected the child?
  13. The willingness of each parent to support and allow the child to spend time with the other parent (unless there is, or has been, domestic abuse).

 The Court will take all of these factors into consideration when ordering custody.  If parents do not agree on a custody arrangement, a parenting time evaluation may be ordered and then the evaluator will look at these factors and make a recommendation. 

  

What if the Father is on the birth certificate?

 Even if the father is on the birth certificate, he still may not be the legal presumed father.  A birth certificate is not the legal proof of paternity in a court case.  A father seeking to establish parenting time will need the certified ROP or a certified copy of the paternity order from the Court.

Minnesota's Courts Bring New Tools in Fighting Domestic Violence

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

Domestic violence is a huge issue in many family law cases, and many times the victims do not feel like the system is able to help them as much as they need it to.  A recent homicide/suicide case has brought this issue to the forefront again.  According to the Star Tribune, “[s]ince 2000, more than 200 Minnesota women have died as the result of domestic violence.”  This statistic is alarming.

 Minnesota was a leading state in the development of domestic violence programs.  In 1980, the Duluth Model was created and is recognized on an international level.  This was the first program to outline multi-disciplinary procedures to protect and advocate for victims.  It looks as though Minnesota is yet again leading the way in the development of domestic violence programs.

 The latest program is called Blueprint.  It will be implemented next year in St. Paul, and should follow on a national level.  This program is described in an article in the Star Tribune from October 4, 2009.  It will assess an offender’s risk of harming again, rather than their flight risk, in setting bail.  This will hopefully keep more victims of abuse safe following an arrest of the perpetrator.

 Hopefully new programs like this will be able to help the problems we see with domestic violence victims.  Any matter that goes through the court system runs the risk of having an increased chance of abuse against a victim.  Situations such as divorce and custody hearings bring out the worst in many people, and when someone already has a propensity for violence, it is a dangerous situation.

ICMCs and the Early Neutral Evaluation Process

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

In Hennepin County and Ramsey County, the family courts have adjusted to make the process more amicable for cases.  Instead of filing a case and having nothing happen for some time, the courts have been automatically setting an initial hearing roughly 3-4 weeks after the time when the case was filed.  This hearing, called the Initial Case Management Conference or ICMC for short, allows the parties to meet the judicial officer in charge of their case.  It also gives the court the opportunity to assess the issues early on and determine what the best way to handle the case would be.

The ICMC is usually a very informal hearing.  Often at ICMCs, the court will order the parties to attend a mediation or early neutral evaluation.  This gives the parties the opportunity to work together to try to work out their problems before going further in the court process and becoming more divided.  Without using any alternative to court, the parties often become more hostile and set in their ways, and settlement becomes more and more difficult.  The courts do not really want to decide such personal issues for people, and the result is often easier for everyone to follow if the parties come to an agreement on any issues without a judge’s help.

Of course, not all cases are suited for resolving through mediation or early neutral evaluation.  For example, when domestic violence is an issue, it may be necessary to have the court’s involvement throughout the process.  ICMCs allow the court to discover that early on and possibly move up any trial dates so that parties can move on with their lives.

More and more counties are recognizing the benefits of earlier involvement in family law cases.  Early neutral evaluation is being integrated into many court systems across the state, and the results have been successful.

Preserving Your Rights When Your Ex Files For Bankruptcy

Monday, September 21st, 2009

In the current economy, many people have been faced with the reality of bankruptcy.  Often, people spent more than they had and are left holding the bill.  The bankruptcy process exists to give individuals a fresh start, but what happens when your ex has an ongoing obligation to you?

The bankruptcy court recognizes that some people might try to get rid of their obligations to former spouses, either in the form of spousal maintenance or child support, by filing for bankruptcy.  The support owed may have accrued so that there are significant arrears, or the ex may feel that they would rather the future obligation disappear.  The court does not allow this to happen.

Any obligation stemming from a “domestic support obligation”, including child support and alimony or spousal maintenance, is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.  Moreover, while all other debts of a person who files for bankruptcy are put on hold during the proceedings, a support obligation is not.  That means that you will still continue to get your monthly payments even as your ex goes through the entire bankruptcy process.

It is easy to understand the court’s basis for this special treatment.  Often, the last place a person wants to spend their money is giving it to their ex.  This is true for child support as well, since the obligor has to send a portion of their paycheck each month to the custodial parent.  If the bankruptcy court did not allow special treatment for domestic support obligations, then there would be a large increase in filings for this very reason.

If your ex is threatening bankruptcy, or is in the process and has stopped paying you your support, then you have the right to bring him or her back to court to enforce your support order.  It is always beneficial to speak with an attorney about your rights and see what steps you should take to protect yourself.

Finding Out You Are Not the Father After Paternity Has Been Established: What Do You Do?

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

In paternity matters, it does come up every so often that a man is told he is the father, has no reason to doubt it, and enters into an arrangement to take care of his responsibilities as a parent. Later down the road, he finds out that the child is not in fact his and he is left with often large amounts of child support, already paid or turned into a judgment against him, with no child to show for it. What happens then?

The courts in Minnesota recognize that this kind of situation does happen, and it is not fair to the man who was trying to do the right thing to be punished financially for it. The Minnesota statutes allow for a man in this situation to go back to the court within 6 months of receiving the results of any genetic tests and have the court find that there is no parent-child relationship. This action may not completely release a man from any obligations, however.

The statute sets out “presumptions” for paternity, or situations where the circumstances make it in the best interests of a child for that man to be considered the father, whether he actually is the biological father or not. One of the presumptions is if the man has held the child out as his own, meaning that he has been acting in the role as the child’s father for the rest of the world to see. If a man has been doing this, it may not be possible to overcome just with genetic testing. It is in the best interests of a child that they have someone in the role as a father, and if a child has known that man as their father, the court will not allow the man to walk away at that time.

The better route to go in this situation is vacating the judgment of paternity to start with. The court is able to say that the judgment is unfair based on the circumstances, which should in effect erase any arrears due in support. There is no consideration of the “best interests of the child” which normally would leave him obligated for support. The court is also able to grant restitution if it finds that it would be proper, which means that any paid child support would be returned to the father.

Welcome To Our Blog

Sunday, August 9th, 2009

This is our first post – we will begin posting soon. Please check back.



- Our Minnesota Divorce Lawyer & Attorney represent clients throughout Minneapolis and Twin Cities including St Paul, West St Paul, South St Paul, Mendota Heights, Mendota, Richfield, Edina, Bloomington, Inver Grove Heights, Woodbury, Oakdale, Lake Elmo, Maplewood, Vandais Heights, Mahtomedi, Cottage Grove, Columbia Heights, New Brighton, Arden Hills, Shoreview, North Oaks, White Bear Lake, St Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Crystal, Bloomington, Burnsville, Apple Valley, Savage, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka, New Hope, New Brighton, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Plymouth, Chanhassen and throughout the entire State of Minnesota.