Posts Tagged ‘Order For Protection’

How can an order for protection influence a custody case or divorce in Minnesota?

Monday, February 1st, 2010

In the state of Minnesota, if you are the victim of domestic abuse you may be able to obtain an Order for Protection. For more information on OFPs, see our webpage. When an incident of violence occurs during the divorce process or even in a custody dispute once the papers have been filed, a victim is still able to use the court process and protections to obtain an OFP.

An OFP can have additional effects other than just putting a no-contact provision in place. In reality, the OFP may end up resolving some collateral issues outside of just contact. For example, if both parties were residing together before the abuse, the OFP may award temporary occupancy of the home to one party, generally the victim of the abuse. This may have a longer-term effect on the other pending legal action if the home is to be awarded in the future.

Obtaining an OFP gives a party faster results than going through the regular court process, but it should not be abused by parties. Provisions determined in an OFP hearing may be later modified in the family law case that is pending. Also, the court is able to look at all circumstances surrounding the incident of abuse to determine if there really is a valid claim for protection or if the court believes the party is abusing the system to gain an advantage in the family court proceedings. Parties should not feel discouraged from bringing an OFP during a custody or divorce proceeding, but it should only be done when there has been a legitimate incident of abuse, or one party is in fear of the other and needs additional protection from the court that they cannot get through the divorce or custody action.

Protective Orders: Consequences of Stipulations

Friday, November 13th, 2009

Orders for Protection (OFPs) and Harassment Restraining Orders (HROs) are the legal tools available to individuals to protect themselves from the actions of others.  OFPs are used to protect individuals who are in fear of bodily harm from another person.  OFPs are covered under Minnesota Statute § 518B, the Domestic Abuse Act.  It covers individuals who have a familial relationship, which is defined as one of the following: spouses and former spouses; parents and children; persons related by blood; persons who are presently residing together or who have resided together in the past; persons who have a child in common regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time; a man and woman if the woman is pregnant and the man is alleged to be the father, regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time; and persons involved in a significant romantic or sexual relationship.  HROs may be obtained against anyone, regardless of their relationship.

 OFPs are often obtained without the assistance of an attorney because there are volunteers who assist in putting together the paperwork needed.  Often, when an individual goes to the hearing for an OFP, the parties settle the issue by agreeing to have an OFP against them (or mutually between the parties) in order to avoid having a hearing and testimony being taken.  Since the parties are not often represented by counsel, they do not consult with an attorney regarding the effects agreeing to an OFP may have on them.  The practice of agreeing to a mutual OFP is generally not the best option for the victim of abuse, however.  The OFP may restrict potential employment opportunities; may have negative consequences when trying to obtain housing; and will remain on the individual’s record for other background checks.

A fact sheet describing the HRO and OFP process in more detail may be found here.  This fact sheet goes into more detail about the procedure for obtaining both orders and what some negative consequences may be from a victim stipulating to a mutual order.

Minnesota's Courts Bring New Tools in Fighting Domestic Violence

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

Domestic violence is a huge issue in many family law cases, and many times the victims do not feel like the system is able to help them as much as they need it to.  A recent homicide/suicide case has brought this issue to the forefront again.  According to the Star Tribune, “[s]ince 2000, more than 200 Minnesota women have died as the result of domestic violence.”  This statistic is alarming.

 Minnesota was a leading state in the development of domestic violence programs.  In 1980, the Duluth Model was created and is recognized on an international level.  This was the first program to outline multi-disciplinary procedures to protect and advocate for victims.  It looks as though Minnesota is yet again leading the way in the development of domestic violence programs.

 The latest program is called Blueprint.  It will be implemented next year in St. Paul, and should follow on a national level.  This program is described in an article in the Star Tribune from October 4, 2009.  It will assess an offender’s risk of harming again, rather than their flight risk, in setting bail.  This will hopefully keep more victims of abuse safe following an arrest of the perpetrator.

 Hopefully new programs like this will be able to help the problems we see with domestic violence victims.  Any matter that goes through the court system runs the risk of having an increased chance of abuse against a victim.  Situations such as divorce and custody hearings bring out the worst in many people, and when someone already has a propensity for violence, it is a dangerous situation.



- Our Minnesota Divorce Lawyer & Attorney represent clients throughout Minneapolis and Twin Cities including St Paul, West St Paul, South St Paul, Mendota Heights, Mendota, Richfield, Edina, Bloomington, Inver Grove Heights, Woodbury, Oakdale, Lake Elmo, Maplewood, Vandais Heights, Mahtomedi, Cottage Grove, Columbia Heights, New Brighton, Arden Hills, Shoreview, North Oaks, White Bear Lake, St Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Crystal, Bloomington, Burnsville, Apple Valley, Savage, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka, New Hope, New Brighton, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Plymouth, Chanhassen and throughout the entire State of Minnesota.